Please leave this field empty
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
  • About
  • Problems
  • Campaigns
  • Impacts
  • Research
  • Contact
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
  • facebook
  • twitter
Please leave this field empty
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
$
Menu
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Search
Please leave this field empty
  • facebook
  • twitter

I Was Barred from a Nobel Laureate Press Conference by a PR Consultant with Monsanto Ties

Food & Water Watch researcher Tim Schwab exposes the empty rhetoric and unexplained discrepancies in the Nobel laureate attack on GMO activists.

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-plus
  • envelope

We all need safe food and clean water.

Donate
Tim Schwab
By Tim Schwab
07.6.16

Last week, as I read a Washington Post article titled “107 Nobel laureates sign letter blasting Greenpeace over GMOs,” I took note that the story fits in perfectly with the Post editorial board’s recently issued position on GMOs, which argues that “scaremongering” activists are getting in the way of scientific progress on GMOs. 

I also noted that the Post, in driving its point home, avoids a lot of inconvenient questions.

Most obviously, how exactly did the 107 Nobel laureates—almost none of whom work in agriculture or have any expertise on GMOs—get involved in an attack on Greenpeace’s position on genetically engineered “golden rice?” Of all the pressing scientific issues, and all the ways to issue a statement, why pick this issue—and why pick a fight?

Industry Attacks on Activists

Working at Food & Water Watch, I’m very familiar with the industry tactic of blaming the failures of GMOs on activists. The content of the Nobel letter, which blames Greenpeace for the failure of genetically engineered “golden rice,” rings familiar. But it does not ring true.

In fact, just a few months ago, a peer-reviewed study examined the failures of “golden rice” and announced that Greenpeace was not to blame, noting that “golden rice” has failed due to technical problems with genetic engineering. After 24 years of work, “golden rice” remains a proposition—not a life-saving crop that will cure vitamin A deficiency, as promised.

So, why are 107 Nobel laureates saying the opposite—and using some pretty amped up, emotional rhetoric?  

In the search for answers, I went to the official press event at the National Press Club in Washington. But as soon as I disclosed my affiliation with Food & Water Watch, a man guarding the door refused my entry. A representative from Greenpeace was also turned away—even though he was there to offer a response to the letter that the Nobel laureates had sent his organization. Without press credentials, the man told us, we weren’t allowed in.

Moments later, the man allowed a representative from Center for Science in the Public Interest, which supports the use of GMOs, to enter the press event.

And then I realized who this bouncer was: Jay Byrne, a former Monsanto communications executive who now runs a private consulting firm that works with biotech companies.

This guy barred my entry to nobel laureate press event on #GMOs. His other clients include syngenta and monsanto https://t.co/x7A6RjWTmj

— Tim Schwab (@TimothyWSchwab) June 30, 2016

The more I learned about this campaign, the more questions appeared.

Last week, documents released through a Freedom of Information Act Request included emails from 2010 between Jay Byrne and an industry-aligned university professor, discussing ways to attack and discredit Greenpeace.

The biotechnology industry’s promises of silver-bullet GMOs coming down the pipeline remain just that—industry promises. 

The full scope of Byrne’s role in the Greenpeace-Nobel campaign remains unknown, but it’s notable that he wasn’t the only industry representative at the event. Industry consultant Val Giddings was milling about. And leading the event was Dr. Richard Roberts of New England Biolabs, a private biotech firm whose products are mentioned in patents from Dow Agrosciences and Monsanto. Roberts, a Nobel winner, organized the Nobel campaign against Greenpeace.

Who wasn’t at the press event? I didn’t see the Austrian playwright who won a Nobel in literature in 2004, whose name is on the Greenpeace letter. Nor did I see Alfred Gilman, also on the letter. He died six months ago.

There is a lot about this campaign that isn’t adding up, and I expect more details will emerge in the days and weeks ahead. What we already know is that the Greenpeace letter doesn’t change the GMO debate one iota. Though the Post doesn’t report it, hundreds of PhD scientists continue to raise questions about the safety of GMOs, and the biotechnology industry’s promises of silver-bullet GMOs coming down the pipeline remain just that—industry promises.

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Monsanto's Roundup is a "probable human carcinogen." We need to ban it!

Get the latest on your food and water with news, research and urgent actions.

Please leave this field empty

Latest News

  • Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

    Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

  • Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

    Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

  • Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

    Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

See More News & Opinions

For Media: See our latest press releases and statements

Food & Water Insights

Looking for more insights and our latest research?

Visit our policy & research library
  • Renewable Natural Gas: Same Ol' Climate-Polluting Methane, Cleaner-Sounding Name

  • The Case to Ban Fracking on Federal Lands

  • Dangerously Deep: Fracking’s Threat to Human Health

Fracking activist with stickersFracking activist in hatLegal team loves family farmsFood & Water Watch organizer protecting your food

Work locally, make a difference.

Get active in your community.

Food & Water Impact

  • Victories
  • Stories
  • Facts
  • Trump, Here's a Better Use for $25 Billion

  • Here's How We're Going to Build the Clean Energy Revolution

  • How a California Activist Learned to Think Locally

Keep drinking water safe and affordable for everyone.

Take Action
food & water watch logo
en Español

Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold & uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people’s health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.

Food & Water Watch is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

Food & Water Action is a 501(c)4 organization.

Food & Water Watch Headquarters

1616 P Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20036

Main: 202.683.2500

Contact your regional office.

Work with us: See all job openings

  • Problems
    • Broken Democracy
    • Climate Change & Environment
    • Corporate Control of Food
    • Corporate Control of Water
    • Factory Farming & Food Safety
    • Fracking
    • GMOs
    • Global Trade
    • Pollution Trading
  • Solutions
    • Advocate Fair Policies
    • Legal Action
    • Organizing for Change
    • Research & Policy Analysis
  • Our Impact
    • Facts
    • Stories
    • Victories
  • Take Action
    • Get Active Where You Live
    • Organizing Tools
    • Find an Event
    • Volunteer with Us
    • Live Healthy
    • Donate
  • Give
    • Give Now
    • Give Monthly
    • Give a Gift Membership
    • Membership Options
    • Fundraise
    • Workplace Giving
    • Planned Giving
    • Other Ways to Give
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Learn more about Food & Water Action www.foodandwateraction.org.
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • 2021 © Food & Water Watch
  • www.foodandwaterwatch.org
  • Terms of Service
  • Data Usage Policy