Please leave this field empty
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
  • About
  • Problems
  • Campaigns
  • Impacts
  • Research
  • Contact
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
  • facebook
  • twitter
Please leave this field empty
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
$
Menu
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Search
Please leave this field empty
  • facebook
  • twitter

Why It Should Anger All Of Us That Trump Still “Has Monsanto’s Back” On Roundup

The EPA’s decision to reauthorize Roundup pesticides means we will be eating, drinking and breathing these poisons for years to come.

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-plus
  • envelope

We all need safe food and clean water.

Donate
By Amanda Claire Starbuck
02.7.20

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announced last week its decision to reapprove glyphosate (the main ingredient in Roundup pesticides), giving its blessing for the continued use of the poison for another 15 years. Despite being an “interim” review decision, it technically functions as a final one, the last major hurdle EPA had to clear before moving forward with reregistration.

White House Quoted Saying Trump “Has Monsanto’s Back”

The decision comes as no surprise; in a July 2018 memo, Monsanto employees quote a White House official saying the Trump administration has “Monsanto’s back on pesticides….Monsanto need not fear any additional regulation from this administration.”

SIGN TO BAN ROUNDUP!
 

In fact—at risk of sounding like a broken record—the entire review process has been fraught with conflicts of interest and secrecy:

  • EPA’s glyphosate Cancer Assessment overwhelmingly relied on industry studies, which are not publicly available or subject to peer review, and are up to 33 times less likely to find evidence of toxicity than those from the open literature. (In comparison, the World Health Organization’s 2015 review only used open literature studies and concluded that glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans.)
  • In 2016, EPA postponed a meeting of the Scientific Advisory Panel—a group of independent scientists tasked with reviewing the agency’s glyphosate cancer assessment—after a pesticide lobbying arm raised hell over the inclusion of a scientist who previously testified against Monsanto in pesticide exposure cases.
  • Court documents revealed Monsanto’s strategy for manipulating the science incorporated into the glyphosate assessment, including ghostwriting academic papers and paying “independent” scientists to sign on as authors.
  • Court documents also revealed that the former EPA official in charge of the glyphosate assessment was secretly colluding with Monsanto to ensure a finding favorable to the pesticide industry, and also fought to “kill” the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services toxicity review of glyphosate.

 

A fight continues over glyphosate’s cancer rating 

Despite criticisms over the agency’s handling of the glyphosate assessment from the divided Scientific Advisory Panel, EPA’s Office of Research and Development, and thousands of public comments, EPA’s interim decision maintains the lowest possible cancer rating for glyphosate: “Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” Roundup will continue to be sprayed on our food crops, public parks, and gardens, entering our food system and polluting our water.

But not all hope is lost. Another announcement came last week, this one from EPA’s internal watchdog, who will be auditing the agency’s pesticide assessment protocols to see if they adhere to federal regulations. And victims who claim they or their loved ones developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma from Roundup exposure continue to fight Bayer (who now owns Monsanto) in court. So far, all three cases that have concluded ruled in favor of the victims. Bayer is now considering no longer offering the sale of Roundup for home use. 

Our EPA should be working for the people, not the pesticide corporations

Ultimately, the question of whether glyphosate or other pesticides cause cancer should not be left to the courts or to individuals. We should be able to count on our protection agencies to protect us. EPA must ensure its pesticide approval process is transparent, relies on publicly available studies, and is impervious to industry interference. 

GET ROUNDUP BANNED!

Related Links

  • It Took a School Groundskeeper Getting Cancer for Roundup to Get Rejected
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Monsanto's Roundup is a "probable human carcinogen." We need to ban it!

Get the latest on your food and water with news, research and urgent actions.

Please leave this field empty

Latest News

  • Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

    Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

  • Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

    Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

  • Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

    Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

See More News & Opinions

For Media: See our latest press releases and statements

Food & Water Insights

Looking for more insights and our latest research?

Visit our policy & research library
  • Renewable Natural Gas: Same Ol' Climate-Polluting Methane, Cleaner-Sounding Name

  • The Case to Ban Fracking on Federal Lands

  • Dangerously Deep: Fracking’s Threat to Human Health

Fracking activist with stickersFracking activist in hatLegal team loves family farmsFood & Water Watch organizer protecting your food

Work locally, make a difference.

Get active in your community.

Food & Water Impact

  • Victories
  • Stories
  • Facts
  • Trump, Here's a Better Use for $25 Billion

  • Here's How We're Going to Build the Clean Energy Revolution

  • How a California Activist Learned to Think Locally

Keep drinking water safe and affordable for everyone.

Take Action
food & water watch logo
en Español

Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold & uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people’s health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.

Food & Water Watch is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

Food & Water Action is a 501(c)4 organization.

Food & Water Watch Headquarters

1616 P Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20036

Main: 202.683.2500

Contact your regional office.

Work with us: See all job openings

  • Problems
    • Broken Democracy
    • Climate Change & Environment
    • Corporate Control of Food
    • Corporate Control of Water
    • Factory Farming & Food Safety
    • Fracking
    • GMOs
    • Global Trade
    • Pollution Trading
  • Solutions
    • Advocate Fair Policies
    • Legal Action
    • Organizing for Change
    • Research & Policy Analysis
  • Our Impact
    • Facts
    • Stories
    • Victories
  • Take Action
    • Get Active Where You Live
    • Organizing Tools
    • Find an Event
    • Volunteer with Us
    • Live Healthy
    • Donate
  • Give
    • Give Now
    • Give Monthly
    • Give a Gift Membership
    • Membership Options
    • Fundraise
    • Workplace Giving
    • Planned Giving
    • Other Ways to Give
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Learn more about Food & Water Action www.foodandwateraction.org.
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • 2021 © Food & Water Watch
  • www.foodandwaterwatch.org
  • Terms of Service
  • Data Usage Policy